PHP Geospatial Libraries: GeoJSON, PostGIS, H3 & Spatial SQL

Developer-first GIS guide

Build reliable location features in PHP with the right combination of GeoJSON/WKT/WKB tooling, PostGIS spatial SQL, and optional indexing (H3/geohash) for scale.

  • Choose the best PHP geospatial libraries for your real use case: near‑me search, geofencing, delivery zones, map overlays, track analytics, and spatial ETL.
  • Learn what should happen in PHP vs what should happen in PostGIS (performance and correctness).
  • Avoid costly pitfalls: SRID drift, invalid polygons, incorrect GeoJSON coordinate order, and missing spatial indexes.

This page is designed to be practical: library selection, architecture decisions, code patterns, and a production checklist.

Code window, robotic arm, lightbulb head and database icons representing PHP geospatial development
A strong PHP GIS stack is usually a mix of format I/O, geometry handling, and spatial databases.

Quick picks: choose a PHP geospatial library in 60 seconds

If you need a fast decision, start here. Most teams don’t need “one GIS library”. They need a clear split: PHP for format handling and application logic, a spatial database for heavy operations, and an indexing strategy if you’ll scale.

Geometry objects + formats

GeoJSONWKT/WKBEWKT/EWKB

Choose a modern geometry library when you need consistent types (Point/Polygon/…), clean I/O for GeoJSON and WKT/WKB, and a path to advanced operations.

Suggested: brick/geo or GeoPHP

Spatial database (real-world scale)

PostGISSpatial SQLGiST index

If your feature requires filtering, sorting, or joining thousands of rows by location, you’ll win by pushing work into the database.

Suggested: PostgreSQL + PostGIS (first choice); MySQL spatial for simpler stacks.

Framework integration

LaravelDoctrineSpatial types

Use framework packages when you want spatial columns, casting, migrations, and query helpers without rewriting your own glue.

Suggested: Laravel spatial packages; jsor/doctrine-postgis for Doctrine.

Distance, tracks and geodesy

HaversineVincentyTracks

Great for point-to-point distances, GPX-style tracks, and “lat/lon math” at the application level. For large datasets, compute in PostGIS.

Suggested: mjaschen/phpgeo

Coordinate transformations (CRS)

EPSGProjectionsPROJ

If you import GIS datasets, CRS problems are unavoidable. You need a disciplined SRID strategy and reliable transforms.

Suggested: proj4php/proj4php

Indexing & aggregation

H3GeohashClustering

Use grid indexes when you need cheap bucketing (heatmaps, counts, caching, clustering) and a scalable pre-filter before exact geometry checks.

Suggested: H3 or geohash packages (pair with PostGIS for correctness).

Reality check: If you need union/intersection/buffers on complex geometries at scale, pure-PHP will struggle. The most robust architecture is usually PHP + PostGIS, optionally complemented by a geometry layer for I/O and validation.

What “geospatial in PHP” really means (and why most pages get it wrong)

Many “PHP GIS library” pages list packages without telling you what they’re actually for. In production, geospatial work has multiple jobs that belong in different layers of your system.

Jobs that PHP libraries do well

  • Geometry representation in your domain (Point, LineString, Polygon, MultiPolygon, …)
  • Format I/O: GeoJSON for APIs, WKT/WKB for databases, KML/GPX/Shapefile for ingestion
  • Validation: reject invalid geometry early, normalize coordinate order, enforce SRID conventions
  • Small computations: distance between two points, bounding boxes, simplification for a single geometry
  • Integration glue: framework casting, DTOs, query builders, conversions

Jobs that should move to PostGIS (or an engine)

  • Filtering and sorting large datasets by distance (“near me”) or containment (“inside polygon”)
  • Spatial joins (points-in-polygons, polygons-intersections across tables)
  • Buffers, intersections, unions on complex geometries
  • Index-backed performance for millions of rows
  • Repeatable analytics (aggregations, clustering, heatmaps, tiles)

This is why the “best PHP geospatial library” depends on your workload. If you want a page that helps you ship faster, the right output is a stack plus a decision framework.

Developer workflow with code screen, robotic arm, disks and cloud upload representing geospatial data pipelines
A robust GIS pipeline usually mixes API inputs (GeoJSON), file imports (SHP/KML/GPX), and database-backed spatial queries.


PHP geospatial libraries by category

The goal of this section is not to overwhelm you with names. It’s to help you create a working stack that: ships quickly, stays correct, and remains maintainable as requirements expand.

1) Geometry & format I/O (GeoJSON, WKT, WKB)

This category is the foundation for API boundaries. Typical needs: parse GeoJSON safely, output GeoJSON consistently, and convert to/from WKT/WKB for databases.

Recommended options

  • brick/geo — modern geometry types and format support (great when you want clean domain models).
  • GeoPHP — pragmatic pure-PHP library with broad format support (useful for mixed GIS file formats).
  • GeoJSON-focused parsers — when your world is “API GeoJSON only” and you want strict validation.

GeoJSON pitfall: coordinate order

In many systems, developers casually write (lat, lon). GeoJSON coordinates are (longitude, latitude). This single mistake creates “it looks close but wrong” bugs that can take hours to debug, especially near coastlines or borders. Make coordinate validation a first-class concern in your PHP layer.

// Defensive PHP idea (pseudo-code)
function assertGeoJsonPoint(array $coords): void {
  // Expect [lon, lat]
  if (count($coords) !== 2) throw new InvalidArgumentException('Point must have 2 numbers.');
  [$lon, $lat] = $coords;

  if (!is_numeric($lon) || !is_numeric($lat)) throw new InvalidArgumentException('Coordinates must be numeric.');
  if ($lon < -180 || $lon > 180) throw new InvalidArgumentException('Longitude out of range.');
  if ($lat < -90  || $lat > 90)  throw new InvalidArgumentException('Latitude out of range.');
}

2) Spatial databases & ORM/framework glue (PostGIS, MySQL spatial)

Your spatial database is where you win on performance and correctness. The question is not “Do I need PostGIS?” but: Which features will my product need in 6–12 months?

  • PostGIS is the default choice if you need serious GIS features: spatial joins, large polygon datasets, accurate distance filtering, and robust indexing.
  • MySQL/MariaDB spatial can be enough for simpler cases and teams already invested in the MySQL ecosystem.
  • Laravel / Doctrine spatial packages matter if your team wants ergonomic spatial columns, casting, migrations, and query helpers.

A practical ORM rule

Use your framework/ORM for basic persistence and common predicates, but do not be afraid of hand-written spatial SQL for complex queries. Spatial performance issues often come from “ORM abstraction leakage”, not from PostGIS itself.

3) Distance & geodesy (Haversine, Vincenty, tracks)

There are two typical “distance” needs:

  • One-off distances (two points, a single route segment, a track length) → PHP libraries are fine.
  • Distance filtering/sorting on many rows (“near me”, “closest 50”, “within 2km”) → PostGIS wins.

If you’re building tracking features (GPX-style tracks, length-by-segment, bounding boxes), a dedicated geodesy library keeps your code readable and tested.

4) CRS / projection transforms (EPSG strategy)

CRS problems are the hidden cost center of geospatial projects. Most bugs are not “math bugs”, they’re “SRID mismatch” bugs: one dataset is EPSG:4326, another is EPSG:3857, and suddenly polygons don’t contain points that obviously sit inside them.

If you ingest GIS datasets or receive coordinates from multiple sources, use a library like proj4php to transform coordinates, and decide early:

  • Which SRID is canonical in your database
  • How you store SRID metadata
  • Where transforms happen (import pipeline vs application requests)
Laptop projecting a 3D holographic cube representing coordinate reference systems and geospatial transformations
CRS discipline is not optional: SRIDs and transformations should be explicit, tested, and documented.

5) Spatial indexing for scale (geohash and H3)

Indexing is not a substitute for spatial correctness. Think of geohash/H3 as fast bucketing: useful for analytics, clustering, caching, and cheap pre-filters.

  • Geohash: simple prefix-based bucketing, easy to implement, great for “rough area” grouping.
  • H3: hex-based global grid; excellent for aggregations (heatmaps, counts by cell, zoom-friendly summaries).
  • PostGIS indexes: still your core “exact query” engine for containment and precise distance logic.

A strong pattern is: grid pre-filter → PostGIS exact predicate. This reduces load without sacrificing correctness.

Neon microchip with circuits representing spatial indexing and performance optimization
Treat indexing as a performance layer, not a geometry engine.

6) GIS file formats (Shapefile, KML, GPX)

Real-world geospatial data often arrives as files: city boundaries (Shapefile), overlays (KML), GPS tracks (GPX). Your job is to ingest them safely and consistently.

  • Shapefile: common for official datasets; expect CRS surprises and geometry validity issues.
  • KML/KMZ: often used for overlays and “shareable polygons”.
  • GPX: activity and tracking data (routes, tracks, timestamps).
Ingestion best practice: Convert to your canonical format early (often PostGIS geometry in a chosen SRID), validate geometry on import, and keep the raw source for traceability.

Comparison table: what each library category is best for

Use this table as a high-level decision guide. Your final choice should follow your requirements: dataset size, geometry complexity, accuracy needs, and deployment constraints.

Category / Example Best for What you get When to avoid
Geometry & formats
brick/geo, GeoPHP
GeoJSON/WKT/WKB I/O, clean geometry objects, validation at the API boundary Consistent types, safer parsing/serialization, predictable data models If you expect heavy spatial ops at scale and plan to do everything in PHP
Spatial DB
PostGIS, MySQL spatial
Near‑me search, containment, intersections, spatial joins, performance at scale Indexes, rich spatial functions, correctness and speed If your workload is tiny and you cannot run a spatial DB (rare for serious GIS)
Framework integration
Laravel/Doctrine spatial
Developer ergonomics: migrations, casting, query helpers, spatial column types Faster delivery, fewer “glue” bugs, consistent usage across the codebase If you need advanced spatial SQL and your abstraction hides query plans
Distance & tracks
phpgeo
Point distances, track lengths, bounding boxes, basic geodesy Readable, testable computations for request-level features Mass queries across large tables (push those to PostGIS)
CRS transforms
proj4php
Transforming datasets across EPSG/SRID systems Repeatable transforms, fewer “mystery mismatch” bugs If all your data is guaranteed SRID-consistent (it rarely is)
Indexing
geohash, H3
Clustering, caching buckets, analytics, fast pre-filters Cheap bucketing, scalable aggregations, improved response time If you use it as a replacement for exact geometry predicates
File formats
Shapefile, KML, GPX packages
Import pipelines for public datasets, overlays and tracks Practical ETL capabilities inside PHP workflows If you ignore validation and CRS handling (imports will “work” but be wrong)

Need a fast “stack decision” for your project?

Tell us what you’re building (near‑me search, zones, ingestion, analytics), your data size, and your constraints. We’ll point you to a stack that won’t collapse under real traffic.


Production checklist: correctness + performance for geospatial PHP systems

If you only copy one section from this page into your internal docs, copy this checklist. Most GIS incidents come from a small set of repeating mistakes.

Data model and storage

  • Pick a canonical SRID (often 4326) and enforce it everywhere (imports, APIs, DB).
  • Store SRID explicitly and reject unknown/mismatched SRIDs at write time.
  • Index geometry (GiST indexes in PostGIS; appropriate spatial indexes in MySQL/MariaDB).
  • Track provenance: where the geometry came from, when it was imported, what CRS it used.

Query design

  • Pre-filter cheaply (bounding boxes, grid buckets), then apply exact predicates.
  • For near‑me, use index-backed filtering + distance ordering on the reduced candidate set.
  • Inspect query plans when spatial queries slow down (indexes may not be used as you think).

Geometry validity and edge cases

  • Validate geometry on ingestion (self-intersections and invalid rings are common).
  • Be explicit about coordinate order at every boundary (GeoJSON is lon/lat).
  • Test edge cases: antimeridian/dateline, poles, and very large polygons.

Scaling and maintainability

  • Use geohash/H3 for aggregation and caching, not as a replacement for geometry checks.
  • Keep the PHP layer focused on I/O + validation + domain modeling.
  • Keep spatial operations centralized and documented: a “spatial query layer” is often worth it.
Hard truth: If you treat geospatial as “just another column”, you will ship incorrect results. Invest early in SRID discipline, validation, and indexes.

FAQs about PHP geospatial libraries

These answers are written to match how teams actually implement GeoJSON APIs, PostGIS-backed search, and GIS imports in PHP.

What is the best PHP library for GeoJSON and WKT/WKB?

If your main problem is converting formats and keeping geometry types clean in your PHP codebase, start with a modern geometry library (for example, brick/geo) or a pragmatic multi-format option like GeoPHP. The key is not the brand name—it’s the workflow: validate GeoJSON in PHP, store canonical geometry in the database, and output consistent GeoJSON at the API boundary.

Should I compute distance in PHP or in PostGIS?

Compute distance in PHP when it’s a small, request-level calculation (two points, a single track, or a small list). For “near me” search across a table, compute in PostGIS with spatial indexes. That’s where you get speed and correctness.

What is SRID and why does it matter?

SRID identifies the coordinate reference system (CRS) used by your geometry. If you mix SRIDs without noticing, your spatial predicates become wrong (points won’t match polygons, distances don’t make sense, overlays drift). Treat SRID as a first-class part of your data model: enforce it, store it, and document it.

Why do polygons “fail” or behave strangely?

The top causes are invalid geometry (self-intersections, wrong ring orientation, unclosed rings) and CRS mismatch. Validate on ingestion, fix or reject invalid shapes, and ensure every geometry is in the SRID you expect before running spatial queries.

How do I build “near me” search correctly in PHP?

Use PostGIS to filter candidates (index-backed), then order by distance on the candidate set. Avoid pulling thousands of rows into PHP and computing Haversine for each row. If you need additional scale, add a pre-filter (bounding box, geohash or H3 bucket) before exact distance logic.

Do I need H3 or geohash?

Not always. If your product needs heatmaps, clustering, “counts by area”, caching by viewport, or cheap bucketing for analytics, H3/geohash can be a big win. If you only need correct “inside polygon” and distance filtering, PostGIS indexes alone may be enough.

What’s the best way to import Shapefiles into a PHP system?

Parse and validate the file, transform to your canonical SRID, then load into PostGIS and build indexes. Keep the original source for traceability. Most “bad imports” come from ignoring CRS metadata or not validating geometry.

Can Laravel or Doctrine handle spatial columns safely?

Yes—if you choose packages that support spatial types and you keep an escape hatch for custom spatial SQL. ORM helpers are great for consistency, but complex spatial logic should remain explicit and testable.

Want these FAQs expanded into a team-ready internal doc? Contact us and tell us your stack and use case.


Work with PHPTrends

If you build a geospatial product, API, database tool, mapping platform, or a PHP library in this space, the hard part is not just “being good”—it’s being discoverable by the developers who need you.

PHPTrends can help you turn technical capability into qualified conversations through developer-first content, clear positioning, and distribution where PHP engineers actually pay attention.

If you want leads from this topic, do this next

Send us your product/library name, your target audience, and the exact geospatial pain you solve. We’ll propose the most effective content angle for conversion (without turning the page into fluff).

No forms on this page by design—just a clear next step.

Scroll to Top